Marine Barracks Attack

On whitethorn 30, 2003, CNN law center do a report, that the snipe on the U. S. maritime barracks in Beirut, Lebanon, that killed 241 Ameri green goddess servicemen was an example of a state-sponsored alarmist charge. The report goes on to translate that U. S. District Judge Royce Lamberth ordered that the plaintiffs in this case the servicemen wounded in the barrage fire and families of those killed, ask a right to obtain judicial simplicity ( suffer CNN. com, 2003). This piece of news is referring to an crimsont that happened cardinal decades ago and yet autoried so much significance that even after twenty years a U. S.District Court deems it worthy of its precious time and resources. The event in school principal transformed the way the world view terrorism. More importantly the state event transformed the way the United States perceive the capabilities and commitment of a new breed of enemy that does non believe in or rely on conventional warfargon. This piece of music testament give a closer look into the battery. And to show its context a part of the airfield will be devoted to into looking at other numerals of terrorism that utilize the same modus operandi. Beirut, Lebanon In the year 1982, Lebanon was at war with Israel.It is an understatement to interpret that the country was war-torn. The smirch was bad enough that it postulated the presence of occidental soldiers to achieve peace and if this is not possible then at least creating a sense of order in the midst of chaos. In lofty of 1982 American soldiers came to Lebanon as part of the multi-national peacekeeping force, which included French, Italian, and British personnel. and according to Kushner, the peacekeepers had nonp atomic number 18il other topic in mind and it was to talk terms a cease-fire mingled with Lebanon and Israel (2003, p. 386). It was matchless of the costliest mistakes the U. S. government and its armed forces of tot everyy time made.They were no t welcome in Lebanon and their desire to end the war was seen as a ploy to help their every last(predicate)y the Israelis. So on the twenty-third of October 1983, on a beautiful morning, at ab bug out 620 AM, a yellow five-ton truck was motor automobilerying hundreds of kilos of explosives. The unsuspecting Lebanese guards who worked at a nearby check lay, did not notice that the bed of the Mercedes-Benz truck was pushed lower than it should have been. The truck was railway carrying a heavy load (Olson, 2003, p. 4). For days the enemy has been hammer the airport with artillery fire only if on this and the day in the beginning that all was peace and quiet.This prompted m whatever marines to take a well merited rest. While the truck was easing its way past the checkpoint nigh of the marines were sleepy in the Battalion Landing Team (BLT) headquarters at the ocean Amphibious Unit (MAU) conflate (Olson, 2003, p. 6). The Mercedes truck was waved through and it proceeded southw ard at a steady pace along the airport road. To the drivers right beyond the airport runway, lay the beautiful Mediterranean Sea. To his leave ran iron fence that separated the road from the marines compound (Olson, 2003, p. 6).Then without warning the suicide bomber driving the vehicle accelerated and made a mad dash to its mean tar scramble. The vehicle went resolveing into the front limen of the BLT mental synthesiss were hundreds of marines were sleeping. And then, Twelve thousand pounds of dynamite detonated among the sleeping marines. The four-story building collapsed to look level, and many who were not lucky enough to die instantly were interred under tons of rubble (2003, p. 7). As a result of the attack Shai remarked, Two hundred and forty- matchless good deal were killed and eighty were injured, most of which were U. S.Marines This terror attack took the heaviest toll on the United States prior to the attacks of September 11, 2001 and quoting the then commander o f the U. S. Marines Corp General Kelly who twenty years ago said, It was the largest terrorist act in the United States history the day became the Corps bloodiest since February 1945, when Marines fought to secure invasion of Iwo Jima (Shai, 2005, p. 91). It is in proceeding difficult to grasp the significance of this event post-911. But in the beginning the September 11, 2001 attacks in that respect was no precedence to the put on of guerilla and unsafe tactics to achieve this kind of destruction.A member of the U. S. Marine Corp is considered to be creme de la creme of the U. S. Armed Forces and taking a few out without acquittance a single shot is considered very unfortunate. But in the car shelling at that place were not only a handful of marines that were eliminated, there were hundreds of them and it dealt a unvoiced vitiate to the collective psyche of the American people and perhaps the peacekeeping team sent to Lebanon. It was later found out that the aline perpetr ators were coming from the Hizballah (Party of God) which according to a fact determination committee of the U. S. government is aRadical Shia aggroup formed in Lebanon dedicated to creation of Iranian-style Islamic re cosmos in Lebanon and removal of all non-Islamic influences from bea. Strongly anti-West and anti-Israel. Closely allied with, and often directed by, Iran, barely whitethorn have conducted rogue operations that were not approved by capital of Iran (see United States Department of State, 1993, p. 46). Car Bombs The modus operandi used here is of course a car bomb which can be a sedan, van or in this case a truck. It is a favorite method of inflicting severe damage. Shaul Shai asserts that the use of a car bomb has several advantages A comparatively large amount of explosives can be hidden inside a car and transported to the target. A car can prevent early spying because it blends in the background cars, vans and trucks are a normal occurrence specially in a very busy area. The vehicle proposes the attackers mobility and flexibility in choosing the target and reaching it. The vehicle enhances the lethal effect of the attack. The vehicle enables the stretch at the target under an innocent guise (2003, p. 15). When it comes to a terrorist attack there is nothing more frightening than the prospect of a car bomb be used against a target.Shai (2003) was correct in maxim that a vehicle provides a disguise and place to hide the explosives objet dart at the same time allowing the device to be moved from one place to the next. Detection is almost impossible unless the bomb maker or its accomplice would specifically point out the location of the vehicle. Imagine for a moment a car bomb parked outside a shop, outside a school, outside an office and no one would stand for twice that there is roughthing wrong with that. Another advantage of a car bomb is the fact that it can be delivered to the target by perplexity and moving the device very quickly from point A to point B.In the case of the Beirut bombing the truck was able to cover the comparatively long distance from the airport gate an area designated for the general public to the restricted zone where the interim barracks was situated. There is no other limb for a suicide bomber that would have fit his requirements for this specific job. A truck was used not only to provide concealment of the explosive device that it also provides for ample space to store world-shaking amounts of explosives. Also, a truck is one of the most common things that one can see in an airport.And finally a truck has an engine in good order enough to ram through reinforced gates and checkpoints and able to crash through doors. At the same time the bomber can get added protection from the more sturdier frame of a truck than a sedan. Moreover, a car bomb has one final advantage, The preparation of a car bomb does not require any special infrastructure any repair shop or garage can be u sed for these preparations (2003, p. 15). With a car bomb a terrorist has a very ductile yet very powerful weapon and if they continue to use it and be successful with it then they would be able to achieve their main inclination which is to instill fear.Serious Intent The bombing of the U. S. Marines barracks was not an isolated case where a group suddenly decided to bomb an enemy outpost. It was a turn over, calculated, and exceedingly coordinated attack. In fact six months before the array barracks bombing a similar signature attack was successfully carried out in the U. S. Embassy in Beirut. On April 18, 1983 a Chevrolet pickup truck loaded with almost 2,000 pounds of explosives sped through the gate of the Embassy in West Beirut and then rammed itself into the building (Kushner, 2003, p. 386). According to Kushner, the explosion killed 63 people, in a blast so powerful it shook the U.S. S. Guadalcanal, anchored five miles away (2003, p. 386). After the U. S. Marine barrack s bombing there was another attack using the same method of bombing the target. In less than a year from the said bombing on September 20, 1984 another car bomb was successfully detonated in the U. S. Embassy political theory of Terrorism In all three attacks one can be see a pattern developing. The method used can be broken down into two major aspects. The first one is the use of car bombs and the second part is the use of suicide bombers. Together these two formed a new kind of enemy which is currently being labeled as terrorists.Terrorism is not a very easy thing to comprehend and at the same time a difficult pattern that one can put a handle on. As they say, one mans terrorist is another mans freedom bomber is profoundly true in many respects. But there are still a few valid arguments that would separate the fanatics from a true soldier that is merely defending their homeland from a zealot who will even take pride in taking out non-combatants. In the case of the terrorists like members of the Hizbollah they attack those that are not even remotely interested in taking away their lands or their freedom.It is at this point when trying to decipher their actions is a mind boggling experience. This is perhaps the power why the American soldiers stationed in Beirut at that time did not anticipate such savagery and suicidal intent because to their minds they were not their as oppressors but brokers of peace. And is it not that peace and goodwill are part of a universal language understood by all peoples of the world? plainly the answer is no and it will take more than the scope of this paper to fully understand the enemys point of view.It is sufficient for the interest of this study to argue that the Americans made a very costly mistake. They approached the situation from a purely political standpoint. Lebanon was at war with Israel. So, they came in, putting lives and record on the line, being so sure that this would have been understood by the enemy as something worthy of respect, even admiration. But what they did not agnize is the fact that there are heavy undercurrents operating just downstairs the surface and it can be said that the American government was innocent enough at that point in time not to understand all these.At that time the idea of fanaticism and stalkism was not fully understood. It has to be put in perspective that the nation of Israeli was still in its infancy. And this is a major issue that is driving the fanatics loony they do not want the existence of Israel in the Middle East. Now, here come the Americans with an offer to mediate between the two warring groups. Yet it was clear to all non-Israelis living in the Arab world that the Americans are partial to Israel. The American soldiers had no inkling that in these parts, no one saw them as peacekeepers but on the contrary they are enemy troops defiling a sublime land.It will be found out later that the attack was set by ideology rather than a kind of nationalistic or ethnic motive driving the perpetrators. This is because the attack was state-sponsored not by Lebanon but by Iran (see CNN. com). According to Shai, the Marine barracks bombings was claimed to be the handiwork of the Islamic jehad organization which was nothing more than a cover name for Pro-Iranian radical Shiite entities (2005, p. 91). Describing the attackers as a product of a movement or an ideology is not an accurate description.If one uses the argument of ideology then one should use Communism or Marxism as an example which is the struggle for an idea. Communists and Marxists would go to war for this idea and this is similar to what has transpired in the said attacks but there is something more to the suicide bombers than meets the eye. This is because they are not simply fighting for an idea but they are advancing a different kind of church property mixed with their own brand of politics. In fact it is difficult to see where politics end and where relig ion begins in the bombings that occurred in the 1980s and all those that followed subsequently.It is therefore more helpful to see the bombing from the perspective of some theorists like Tore Bjorgo who suggests that the perpetrators of the car bombings were terrorists and that they use methods or strategies of combat that, involves premeditated use of violence against (at least primarily) non-combatants in order to achieve a psychological effect of fear on others than the immediate targets (2005, p. 2). These acts of terrorism are guided by a spiritual and political framework which makes it so difficult to anticipate and so hard to neutralize. Human nature is predictable, it is the preservation of ones own life.People will kill others for self-defense and they would even kill their friends for self-preservation but they will not offer their lives for others. In many instance a person will perhaps die trying to save someone but it is rare to see someone die to make a statement or t o force others to do something. It is no wonder why the U. S. personnel were ill-equipped to neutralize a new type of enemy soldier that emerged in the battle grounds of the Middle East. The Aftermath From the commentary above of terrorism one can say that the attack on the U. S. Marine barracks was unique because in a normal terrorist attack the targets are non-combatants.But in this case the terrorists were able to strike hard and fast against the intended target which are the soldiers. According to Shaul Shai, One of the guidelines pertaining to the issue of suicide attacks require that the attack achieve exceptional results which can be applied as leverage for political or military changes, and inflict significant losses upon the enemy. In addition, the suicide terrorist must carry out his deed out of a sense of complete understanding and recognition regarding the value of his deed and his personal martyrdom (2005, p. 91)Considering the above statement it can be argued that th e terrorists trusty for the attack were indeed successful and that they achieved what they set out to do. With regards to the goal of creating leverage for political or military changes, Kushner referring to the Embassy and Marine barracks attacks alluded to how the terrorist group indirectly influenced the matter of the political and military scenario. And Kushner wrote, The two-baser horror of these disasters led to a hurl in public support of the U. S. military presence in Lebanon and hastened the coitus interruptus of U.S. and Western European troops from the country (2003, p. 386). The attacks also achieved one of its prime goals which is to wage an effective psychological warfare over their enemies situated thousands of miles away. In a report to the former President Reagan, Vice-President George Bush made the pastime remarks, Terrorism deeply troubles the American people. A Roper poll showed that 78 percent of all Americans consider terrorism to be one of the most s erious problems facing the U. S. Government today (Bush, 1987, p. 22).Conclusion The attack on the temporary U. S. Marines barracks on October 23, 1983 at Beirut, Lebanon was one of the deadliest ever. What makes it sadder is the fact that those who died were one of the best and brightest that the U. S. military forces could offer. They died not from combat but from the hands of a fanatical terrorist group that did not consider the fact that they came for peace. The Americans were given strict instructions on maintaining extreme tolerance. They were there to initiate a cease fire between Lebanon and Israel.For their noble efforts they were rewarded with a deadly car bomb that took 241 lives most of them died in their beds without given a chance to defend themselves. The motivation is a crazy mix of politics, ideology, and religion. Conventional warfare is out of the question and the enemy is kernel in eliminating even non-combatants. In the case of the barracks bombing they felt double pleasure in knowing that they were not only able to take out American lives but also that they dealt a major blow to their primary targets which were the elite U. S. Marines.