Why The Russians Were Right :: Essays Papers

Why The Russians Were RightZubok and Pleshakov wrote this appropriate in raise for westerners to understand the Cold War from the Soviet perspective, one mustiness understand the importance of that moment and the larger historic legacy of Russia and the Russian Revolution, vindicated by the victory of 1945 (2). These men wanted the western world to be able to read this book and understand the different personalities that do up the Kremlin, their personal experiences and how this affected their political leadership. To reveal the Kremlin, in a humanistic way, the authors used the newly declassified documents from the Russian side, to explore the background, psychology, motives, and style of Soviet rulers from Stalin to those who replaced him, and to better understand the world that they helped create (xii)The main thesis of the novel is It was this group the Kremlin that had replaced the Communist politburo during the four years of the most desolate war in the worlds history . Leading the others, walking at some distance from them was Joseph Stalin, the head of the USSR (1).Zubok and Pleshakov start out explaining the basic views of the Kremlin round 1945, before Stalin comes to power. They then move to the revolutionary world of Stalin and the expansions of the empire that were gained by Molotov. At this point in the book the emphasis shifts to war, nuclear bombs and geopolitics. Contained in these sections are chapters on Zhdanov Beria and Malenkov and Kennedy and Khrushchev. The formation of these chapters and subjects in this particular line-up progresses in the order that they historically happened. In order to understand why the USSR made some of the political choices, trying to remove some of the biases in place passim the world, the authors give personal background information on the USSRs major(ip) leaders of the Cold War time. At one extreme in the USSR government they experienced, Stalin, who lived through war, which made him a ruth less and hardened man. sequence on the other extreme is Khrushchev, who lived through the revolution, which made him a risk taker and outstanding bluffer. These two men compromise most of the focus of the book because both brought the world close to war again with their personalities running the Kremlin, Krushchev sightly brought it closer to nuclear war. The authors use the idea that Westerners do not deplete a clear understanding of the culture of communist Russia.